Relevance in Tort or Negligence Cases Free Essay Example, 1500 words

Any advice from a professional, even if not express or formal or written, is binding even if there is a proviso of non-accountability. The characteristic of that relationship which is not express or formal or written may be denominated as a special in that it is not in the regular or a standard form. As a matter of course, one that is not ordinary is special. In professional ethics, it does not matter whether the relationship is either. In the instant case and according to its underlying circumstances, however, you are not liable. Why? Because your advice did not guarantee success in any given situation which was, as a matter of fact, subject to unpredictable variances and that if the client took it as a wagering decision, she did so at her own risk. In contrast, an engineer who advises this and that specification in a building which later on collapses out of a minor tremor can be liable. Why? Because in the latter example, the advised specification is presumed to mean that the buil ding could withstand ordinary quakes. We will write a custom essay sample on Relevance in Tort or Negligence Cases or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/page